After dismissing X-Males ’97’s former showrunner Beau DeMayo simply earlier than the present’s season one premiere, the studio appeared prepared to maneuver on with a brand new inventive crew. However following DeMayo’s latest claims that Marvel unfairly pulled his credit from X-Males ’97’s upcoming second season, the corporate says he was fired over the “egregious” findings of an inside investigation.
Although DeMayo was fired earlier than X-Males ’97 aired, his title was nonetheless going to be included within the present’s upcoming second season due to the pre-production work he contributed to the challenge. However in a thread posted to his X account on Thursday, DeMayo accused Marvel of stripping his season two credit away on account of his posting fan artwork of himself. DeMayo, who’s brazenly homosexual, implied that Marvel’s choice was pushed particularly by the fan artwork, which depicts him because the X-Males Cyclops with out his signature blue spandex and was posted throughout pleasure month on June 4th. DeMayo additionally mentioned that his firing was “the most recent in a troubling sample I suffered by means of” whereas working for Marvel on X-Males ’97 and the embattled Blade film.
However in a concise assertion to The Hollywood Reporter, Marvel mentioned that DeMayo’s firing got here as the results of an investigation that discovered him to have engaged in “egregious” habits in direction of different staff. In response to nameless sources cited by THR, “sexual misconduct” was a part of why DeMayo was fired from season one, and Deadline studies that the elimination of his credit is a consequence of his breaching a separation settlement with Marvel.
Following Marvel’s assertion that it had ample cause to let DeMayo go, DeMayo’s lawyer, Bryan Freedman, put out a press release defending his consumer, claiming that Disney is “secretly trying to plant unlawful unconscionable objects in contracts that silence the reality.”
The assertion continues: “As we’ll clarify by means of detailed examples which we’ll roll out intimately one after the other, Disney’s mannequin could be very clear and a repetitive unlawful sample. As soon as it will get challenged or uncovered, the gaslighting and redirection of the blame towards anybody keen to inform the reality begins by means of a world properly oiled publicity machine.”